Monday, February 19, 2007

First there was Ronald, and then Arnold, and now Al!

America has seen its share of movie stars and TV actors who have made the leap from entertainment to politics. Ronal Reagan and Arnold Schwarzenegger are just two recent examples. But is America ready for a former comedian in the Senate? I know what you’re thinking…it couldn’t be any worse that some of the jokers we have now.

More than twenty years ago Neil Postman observed the demise of serious political discourse and identified television as the culprit. According to Postman, the triviality of television makes everything on it trivial…including political speech and campaigning. In Amusing Ourselves to Death, Postman argued, “The problem is not that television presents us with entertaining subject matter but that all subject matter is presented as entertaining” (p. 87). Postman maintained that television reduces important conversations to snippits and sound bites, with too much attention paid to the image and too little to the message. For Postman, as with McLuhan, the medium is the message--and TV is a visual medium that caters to those who have short attention spans. Postman also observed more than twenty years ago that the emphasis on the visual nature of the medium means that we will no longer consider overweight or homely candidates. And those with facial hair shouldn’t even think about running for office. But for a candidate who is blessed with good looks, a quick wit, and an ability to perform in front of the cameras, the sky (or the Whitehouse) is the limit.

It would come as no surprise to Postman, (who died in 2003) that Al Franken, a comedian, whose claim-to-fame is as a writer and actor for Saturday Night Live, could consider a run for political office.


Postman, N. (1985). Amusing ourselves to death: Public discourse in the age of show business. NY: Penguin books.

Monday, February 12, 2007

The Dixie Chicks and their Grammys

At this year's Grammy Awards, the Dixie Chicks won in all five categories in which they were nominated (Best Country Performance by a Duo or Group with Vocal, Best Country Album, Record of the Year, Song of the Year, Album of the Year).

Do you think these awards were given as an industry message in support of free speech? Or was it a message from an often-perceived liberal industry thumbing its nose at right-leaning music fans? Maybe there was no intended message...what do you think?

Monday, February 5, 2007

All You Need is Love

Apple Inc. and Apple Corps have decided to kiss and make up. The terms of the settlement are confidential ( Apple Inc. will own all of the trademarks related to "Apple" and will license a portion of those trademarks back to Apple Corps for their continued use). Hint hint - it may be a very special Valentine’s Day for Beatles fans on iTunes.

However, if you’re in college, you might not care that Sargent Pepper’s could soon be available for “legal” download (not to mention Beatles demos, outtakes, previously unreleased songs - I'm getting goosebumps already) . Multiple studies still show that college students have no ethical issues with illegal downloading, etc. So, how do we fix this? How do we get a generation/culture to understand, stealing is not cool? Should we offer stiffer penalties, community service or jail time - can we force them to attend a Mariah Carey concert?

Seriously… can these people be saved?